|
Recently price of inexpensive SATA hard
drives is becoming very low while their capacity is growing up.
There're many pluses and minuses of both tape- and disk-based backup
systems.
Price. Tape backup system is
still much less expensive than disk-based backup. Let us show pricing
for disk-based and tape-based storages for 14TB:
Disk-based configuration:
|
Component
|
Example
|
Price
|
|
Chassis, 40 hotswap bays
|
RM8U8042
|
$4,000 US
|
|
RAID controllers, 24 ports
|
Areca ARC-1170 SATA II 24
|
2 x $1,500 US = $3000 US
|
|
Motherboard with CPU and memory
|
-
|
$1500
|
|
Hard drives, 28
|
Hitachi, Seagate
|
28 x $130 = $3640
|
|
Total:
|
$12,410 US
|
Tape-based configuration:
|
Component
|
Example
|
Price
|
|
Tape library with single LTO2 drive
|
DELL powervault 136-T
|
$5,000 US
|
|
Tapes, 72 cartridges
|
Fujitsu LTO2
|
72 x $30 = 2160
|
|
Total:
|
$7,160 US
|
As you can see, pricing of tape-based
solution is about 57% of disk-based solution.
Stability.
Average tape cartridge is able to
handle approximately 250 cycles. In our situation we use
approximately 6 cartridges per week, which is 24 cartridges per
month. With 60 cartridges loaded into library, each cartridge is used
2.5 times per month, which is 250 cycles/2.5 per month = 100 months.
Of course it depends on your environment condition. For example, if
temperature is unstable or you have some dust in your location, it
may decrease your tapes' lifetime.
Hard drive-based system looks more
stable but as our experience shows, SATA hard lifetime is about 1-2
years, depending on usage, and environment and luck but still if you
fail to notice RAID failure on time you have great chance to loose
all backup data in case if two hard drives will fail in RAID5
configuration and if three hard drives will fail in RAID6
configuration.
Long term saving.
If you want to keep your data for long
time, for example, banks records and any other records that require
saving for long time, you can save data on tape cartridges, pull them
out and save them at different location for long time. Average safe
time is about 30 years. As you understand, this solution is almost
unavailable for disk-based storage.
Power consumption.
Dell PowerVault 136-T consumes 110
Watts per hour while disk-based storage with 28 hard drives and
single CPU uses about 800-1000 Watts. And due to this fact, to
support your disk-based configuration, your cooling system must be
able to handle this power consumption as well.
Availability. Because tape-based
storage is sequence read-write system, there's only one operation
available in a moment. For example, if you need to restore your data,
you must stop current backup in order to restore data. And also
nobody else is able to restore data at this moment. Disk-based system
is free from this limit, which is big advantage if you provide backup
system of many customers who need to access to their data
simultaneously.
We don't know which solution is the
best for you. You need to consider your needs and choose most
suitable solution for your situation. Each solution has minuses and
pluses. You could try from lower solution (tape-based system) and
expand the whole system by disk-based solution. For example, you can
use disk-based solution for immediate access to data, while keeping
2-3 months of full backup on your inexpensive tape-based system.
|